Sunday, September 2, 2007

You can be better or you can be bitter

You know, this is going to be fun. Because practically every post that Fish Creek Makes on their INNside Innkeeping blog is taking content from somewhere else. No matter how much or how often people complain, they still keep taking other people's content.

Yesterday, September 1, 2007, they posted this post: UPDATE, Tuesday Sept 4, 2007: Looks like they took down the article. Score 1 for Fish Creek House Watch!

You can be bitter or you can be better

Note the paragraphs on "First Key: Control" and "Second Key: Alt(ernate)"

Now look at this article, from Ezine Articles:

Ctrl-Alt-Delete Your Life

written by author Soni Pitts, and published on September 24, 2004. I wonder how Soni feels about the Fish Creek House lifting her words and passing them off as their own?

In the very same Fish Creek post, notice these sentences from the second paragraph:


I think the key (pun intended) difference between happy people and unhappy people is in the translation of the events of their lives. It’s also the difference between successful people and unsuccessful people


and now notice the first paragraph by musician Christine Kane:


It seems to me that the difference between happy people and unhappy people is in the translation of the events of their lives. It’s also the difference between successful people and unsuccessful people


Further along, in the section labeled "Second Key" you'll find this text:


Sometimes I think this is the only reason to take risks — so you don’t go through life settling for what you’ve always believed to be true. And you get to have these moments where you look up from your little-mindedness and say, “Ohhhhhh. You mean, I don’t have it quite right here? You mean, there’s a better way of seeing this?” I come from a background of second-guessers. It didn’t matter what the decision was — if the result brought about any level of discomfort or or challenge, my mother would inevitably say, “Oh! We should have � (Fill in the blank” I’m not blaming my mom here, but I am saying that I was programmed at an early age for regret, second-guessing, doubt, and not trusting my own judgment .


Compare that to text in the third and fourth paragraphs of Christine's post:


Sometimes I think this is the only reason to take risks — so you don’t go through life settling for what you’ve always believed to be true. And you get to have these moments where you look up from your little-mindedness and say, “Ohhhhhh. You mean, I don’t have it quite right here? You mean, there’s a better way of seeing this?”
I come from a background of second-guessers. It didn’t matter what the decision was — if the result brought about any level of discomfort or envy or challenge, my mother would inevitably say, “Oh! We should have �Ķ. (Fill in the blank�Ķ ordered the steak instead of the shrimp, stayed at that beach house and not this one, waited til Hecht’s had a sale and gotten this cheaper�Ķ)” I’m not blaming my mom here, but I am saying that I was programmed at an early age for regret, second-guessing, doubt, and not trusting my own judgment and discernment.


Amazing, isn't it?

Fish Creek House has managed to do a mashup of two posts by different people. Throw an original sentence in here and there, and voilá, "insta-entry". Too bad it's almost entirely plagiarized.

5 comments:

Unknown said...

Hmmm...the page is all disappeary now. Poor page.

ken winston caine said...

Wish I'd saved the solicitation, FishWatcher.

Sometime in the last year I received an emailed salesletter for some automatic-article-writing software that would do exactly this.

It was being marketed to blackhat Adwords bloggers who were wanting to game Google by putting up thousands of trash blogs tied to specific keywords.

You would type in the keywords or subject you wanted an article written about and the software would search the online article directories and (maybe the web at large, I don't recall) and make supposedly intelligent selections of pertinent material and grab a little here and a little there and piece them together to compose and publish your article for you on your trash blog.

I was disgusted with the idea and the salesletter's claim that this was not plagiarism, but "fair use" and the kind of legitimate research that all writers do. (But I'm especially sensitive about such things, having made my living as a writer forever.)

And I didn't really believe that it would work; that is, that the software would make intelligent and coherent pairings of sentences and paragraphs swiped from a variety of articles.

You have me wondering now if we are seeing that software in action.

If so, unethical and stupid as it do be, it's got some pretty smart cutting and pasting going on.

Best,
kwc
----------------------------------
k e n . w i n s t o n . c a i n e
full of natural goodness since 1952

editor, http://www.mindbodyspiritjournal.com
sharing holistic how-to since 1992

Fishy said...

Hi Ken,

That is very very interesting. It would explain things if this were the case. I mean, it seems like this outfit has gone to extraordinary lengths to find other people's content to use in their posts. So much work, when they could just as easily write their own posts. If all they are doing is clicking a mouse in a software program and presto jammo, there's the post, well then, that would certainly take less time than doing your own writing.

Fishy said...

Sorry Soni - Oddly, the image file I took disappeared too. Fishy, eh?

Unknown said...

I did a quick web search and came up with this salespage for automated artice-stealing software similar to what I described.

If this is the same software I was recalling earlier, it requires just a bit more human intervention than I described. But not a lot.

This is NOT a disguised affiliate link:
http://www.instantarticlewizard.com/

Best,
ken-winston caine
chock-full of natural goodness since 1952

Editor, http://www.mindbodyspiritjournal.com
offering holistic how-to since 1993